Case 1303661/2021 · Employment Tribunal
ADEYINKA ILEYMI v Birmingham Metropolitan College — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303661/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MANLEY Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ADEYINKA ILEYMI
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing in Birmingham on 7 February 2022, Employment Judge Manley found for the Claimant, Adeyinka Ileymi, against Birmingham Metropolitan College. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel. The case concerned payment for hours worked and pay in lieu of notice.
The tribunal held that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant for hours worked. It found this was both a breach of contract and an unauthorised deduction from wages within section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Damages of £566.07 gross were awarded for that item.
The tribunal also held that the Respondent terminated the Claimant's contract without the full period of notice to which he was entitled. It found that this was a breach of contract and also an unauthorised deduction from wages within section 13 ERA 1996. Damages of £1,759.80 gross were awarded for that item.
The total sum ordered was £2,325.87 gross. The judgment does not set out any separate award for interest or other components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant for hours worked and treated this as a breach of contract and an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £566 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the Respondent terminated the Claimant's contract without the full notice period to which he was entitled. It also held that this amounted to an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,326
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.