Case 1303804/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Barrett v Crown Prosecution Service — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303804/2019
- Decision date
- 17 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Barrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Dean recorded a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The proceedings brought by Ms D Barrett against Crown Prosecution Service were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the race discrimination, sex discrimination, or unlawful deduction from wages matters identified in the listing categories. No remedy award or monetary breakdown was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or findings for this listed claim category. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or findings for this listed claim category. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give separate reasons or findings for this listed claim category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.