Case 1303931/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Reddington v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303931/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Reddington
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded two complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages. The complaint concerning deductions between 24 January and 6 March 2023 was found not to be well-founded and was dismissed.
A separate complaint about a deduction made on 26 January 2023 in the sum of GBP 1,932.26 was withdrawn by the claimant at the start of the hearing. The judgment states that this withdrawn complaint was not dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages between 24 January and 6 March 2023 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint about a deduction made on 26 January 2023 of GBP 1,932.26 was withdrawn by the claimant at the start of the hearing and was not dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.