Case 1304136/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Copeland v Water Plus Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304136/2021
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs M Howard, Mr P Wilkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Copeland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard Ms N Copeland's claims against Water Plus Ltd at Birmingham Employment Tribunal via CVP/hybrid hearing on 12 and 13 October 2022, before Employment Judge Noons with Mrs M Howard and Mr P Wilkinson. The respondent was represented by counsel and the claimant appeared in person.
The Tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages, finding that it was not well founded. It also unanimously dismissed the complaint of harassment related to disability, again finding that it was not well founded.
No monetary award was made. The judgment does not record any separate remedy assessment or any further findings beyond the dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found the complaint was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The Tribunal found the complaint of harassment related to disability was not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.