Case 1304196/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. R. Razaq v The Security Institute — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304196/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. R. Razaq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew claims against The Security Institute. The withdrawn claims were direct race discrimination, direct religion or belief discrimination, and harassment related to race and religion or belief.
Employment Judge Wedderspoon dismissed those claims upon withdrawal under rule 52. The judgment does not address remedy, legal tests, hearing dates, or panel members.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that direct race discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that direct religious/belief discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment related to race was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment related to religious/belief was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.