Mr P Cooke v University of Warwick — 2020

Case reference: 1304220/2020
Decision date: 3 June 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hughes

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Cooke

Respondent

University of Warwick

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment was issued as a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 in proceedings brought by Mr P Cooke against The University of Warwick. It states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.

The judgment does not record any adjudicated findings on the merits of the listed flexible working or sex discrimination matters. It records no remedy award, compensation, interest, or other monetary order.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Flexible working	The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal by the claimant; the flexible working classification comes from the listing category, as the judgment text itself does not specify the pleaded claims.	Withdrawn	—	—
Sex discrimination	The judgment records dismissal of the proceedings following withdrawal by the claimant; the sex discrimination classification comes from the listing category, as the judgment text itself does not specify the pleaded claims.	Withdrawn	Sex	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.