Case 1304319/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Phillips v Non-attendance — 2022
- Case reference
- 1304319/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Midlands (West) Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Knowles, heard the case on 23 March 2022. The respondent did not attend. The written judgment records that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the Claimant's claims because they were presented out of time.
As a result, the claims were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no remedy was awarded.
The record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text does not include any such further reasons or any split of the claims into separate heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states only that the Claimant's claims were presented out of time and that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider them. It does not identify any further particulars of the claim in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.