Case 1304378/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Moulton v Capita plc RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 1304378/2024
- Decision date
- 8 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs J Keene, Mr R White
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Moulton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Record of a Preliminary Hearing heard in the Midlands West on 1 to 4 September 2025 before Employment Judge Hindmarch, with Mrs J Keene and Mr R White sitting as members. The claimant was Miss R Moulton and the respondent was Capita Plc. The judgment records six complaints and gives a short disposal for each.
The complaint of direct sex discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal. The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was found not well-founded and dismissed. The complaint of direct race discrimination was also found not well-founded and dismissed.
The tribunal further dismissed the complaint of harassment related to race, the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and the complaint of harassment related to disability. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states: 'The complaint of direct sex discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to race was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to disability was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.