Case 1304532/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1304532/2023
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robin Broughton
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Dr G Hammersley, Mrs I Fox
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Birmingham on 7 to 14 October 2024 before Employment Judge Robin Broughton, sitting with Dr G Hammersley and Mrs I Fox. The claimant, Mr W Douglas, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R Powell, counsel.
The written judgment records only the outcome: the claimant's claims of race discrimination and harassment failed and were dismissed. No separate findings of fact, liability reasoning, or remedy assessment are set out in the written record provided. The note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claimant's claims of race discrimination and harassment failed and were dismissed; it does not separately specify the protected characteristic for the harassment claim, but the case was listed as Race Discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.