Case 1304695/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Mall v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1304695/2018
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr Stanley, Mr Davis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Mall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 25 November 2019, Employment Judge Cookson sat with Mr Stanley and Mr Davis and recorded a judgment by consent. The claimant was represented by Mr Wilson and the respondent by Ms Shepherd.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, breach of contract and a claim in respect of annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998 were withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment records no findings on the merits and no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn and dismissed by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Withdrawn and dismissed by consent. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn and dismissed by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim in respect of annual leave under the Working Time Regulations 1998; withdrawn and dismissed by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.