Case 1305054/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Palmer-Walters v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 1305054/2023
- Decision date
- 17 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
- Panel members
- Mrs E Shenton, Mr D Spencer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Palmer-Walters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed all complaints. It found that the complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, indirect race and/or disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, harassment related to race and/or disability, and victimisation were not well-founded.
The written judgment records the outcomes only. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons were not included in the supplied judgment.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint of indirect race discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed; the judgment describes this together with indirect disability discrimination as race and/or disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of indirect disability discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed; the judgment describes this together with indirect race discrimination as race and/or disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to race was not well-founded and dismissed; the judgment describes harassment related to race and/or disability. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability was not well-founded and dismissed; the judgment describes harassment related to race and/or disability. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.