Case 1305136/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Muzaffar v Birmingham City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305136/2021
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Ms S Outwin, Mr T Liburd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Muzaffar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham on 17 to 21 July 2023 before Employment Judge Kenward, sitting with Ms S Outwin and Mr T Liburd. Mr P Muzaffar brought claims against Birmingham City Council for unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment related to disability.
The judgment records that each claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the supplied text, and the extract does not set out separate remedy findings or detailed reasons for the dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim of harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.