Case 1305234/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Hussain v West Midlands Trains Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305234/2023
- Decision date
- 18 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr D McIntosh, Mrs E Shenton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 16 to 18 September 2024 before Employment Judge Mensah, sitting with Mr D McIntosh and Mrs E Shenton. The tribunal gave oral judgment on the last day of the hearing and stated that full reasons were given to the parties orally.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims of direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 were not made out. All of those claims were dismissed.
The written record does not set out separate factual findings or any remedy award. It records only the dismissal of the Equality Act claims and notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard process.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.