Case 1305569/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Hart v DHL Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305569/2024
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Hart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 11 November 2024. The respondent was represented by senior legal counsel.
Employment Judge Bansal struck out the claimant's claim on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospects of success under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and/or had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). Oral reasons were given at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim globally and did not give separate written reasons for this specific claim category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim globally and did not give separate written reasons for this specific claim category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.