Case 1305651/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Charlotte Hastings v The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1305651/2022
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
- Panel members
- Mrs R Forrest, Mrs M Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Charlotte Hastings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss Charlotte Hastings withdrew her claims for holiday pay and harassment on day one of the final hearing, which was heard on 13 August 2025. Employment Judge Smart, sitting with Mrs R Forrest and Mrs M Howard, dismissed those two claims upon withdrawal.
The judgment expressly states that none of the Claimant's other claims were affected by this judgment and that they would continue to be heard. No findings on liability or remedy were recorded for any continuing claims, and no monetary award or remedy breakdown was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant on day one of the final hearing on 13 August 2025. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the harassment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant on day one of the final hearing. The extracted judgment text does not identify the protected characteristic relied on for harassment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.