Case 1305703/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Clare Maguire v Ministry of Justice PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305703/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Clare Maguire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 24 October 2023 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke, the claimant’s application to amend was partially granted. The amendment connected with the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was allowed, while the proposed amendments to add direct sex discrimination and harassment on grounds of sex were refused.
On the reasonable adjustments point, the tribunal accepted that adding a reference to 'recourse to Band D staff' was a factual detail to an existing allegation rather than a new claim. It considered that the respondent would only need a minor amendment to its Response and that the evidential burden would not be materially increased, so the balance of injustice and hardship favoured permitting that amendment.
The proposed sex discrimination and harassment amendments were treated as entirely new allegations. The tribunal noted that the direct discrimination allegations related to June 2021 incidents and the harassment allegations to March 2022, that the application was considerably out of time, and that no sufficient basis was shown to extend time. It also noted that the claimant already had existing claims including direct disability discrimination, direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments, so refusing the further amendments was proportionate under Rule 2.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Application to amend the existing failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was partially granted. The tribunal allowed the proposed reference to 'recourse to Band D staff' as a factual detail to be added to the existing allegation. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Proposed amendment to add direct sex discrimination allegations was refused. The tribunal treated the proposed matters as new allegations, said they related to incidents in June 2021, and declined to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Proposed amendment to add harassment on grounds of sex was refused. The tribunal treated the proposed matters as new allegations, said they related to incidents in March 2022, and declined to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership
- balance of injustice and hardship
- Rule 2 (Overriding Objective)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.