Case 1305898/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Baker v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305898/2018
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr PJ Simpson, Ms BH Astill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham on 20, 21, 22, 23 and 26 September 2022 before Employment Judge Meichen, Mr PJ Simpson and Ms BH Astill. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of constructive unfair dismissal, direct age discrimination and harassment related to age failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment describes this as direct age discrimination. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment describes this as harassment related to age. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.