Case 1306014/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Da Silva v Costa Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1306014/2024
- Decision date
- 26 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Da Silva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dimbylow on 24 March 2025, the tribunal decided that Mr F Da Silva's claim form included a claim for harassment related to race. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had provided factual details about two such matters and confirmed that 32 other matters were background information only in relation to those two claims, which were the only issues to be adjudicated upon at a final hearing. No amendment to the claim form was required for that claim.
The tribunal also decided that the claim form included a claim for whistleblowing detriments and that the claimant had provided factual details about that claim. No amendment to the claim form was required to include it. The respondent's application to strike out the claims was not pursued, and the tribunal dismissed that application.
The respondent's application for a deposit order in relation to the Public Interest Disclosure claim was adjourned to be heard on 16 June 2025. The judge stated that he could not determine that application because no notice had been given by the tribunal under Rule 53 of the Rules of Procedure 2024 and it was not referred to in the respondent's notice of application dated 28 February 2025. No remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | At a public preliminary hearing the tribunal recorded that the claim form included a claim for harassment related to race, with factual details provided for two matters and 32 other matters treated as background information only. The merits were left for adjudication at a final hearing. | Other | Race | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal recorded that the claim form included a claim for whistleblowing detriments and that no amendment was required to include it. The respondent's deposit order application for the Public Interest Disclosure claim was adjourned to 16 June 2025. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 53 of the Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.