Case 1306260/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Written Representations (Paper Hearing) For v Sol Attendance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306260/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Written Representations (Paper Hearing) For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not provide a response to the claims. The tribunal had invited the claimants to submit details and supporting documents and later invited all parties, including the respondent, to submit further written representations. The hearing proceeded on paper.
On the information and documentation provided by the claimants listed in paragraph 1, the tribunal awarded net sums for unpaid wages, unpaid commission where applicable, unpaid notice pay and unpaid holiday pay. The sums were stated to be net of income tax and national insurance, on the basis that the respondent would make the corresponding payment to HMRC.
The tribunal did not award general damages for distress and inconvenience arising from non-payment of wages because it held that it lacked jurisdiction to make such an award in the circumstances. Miss Minshall's duplicate claims under claim numbers 1306273/2019 and 1300050/2020 were dismissed as duplicates, and the claims of Mr Anil Patel and Mr Steven Straughan were adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awards were made for unpaid wages and unpaid commission. The judgment treated the claims as claims for unpaid sums and calculated the awards net of income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £25,803 |
| Breach of contract | Awards were made for unpaid notice pay or unpaid notice. | Upheld | — | £5,911 |
| Holiday pay | Awards were made for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £4,754 |
| Other | The claimants pursued general damages of £5000 for distress and inconvenience caused by non-payment of wages. The tribunal made no such award because it held that it lacked jurisdiction in these claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36,442
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.