Case 1306307/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N I Lone v Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited and 5 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306307/2019
- Decision date
- 9 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
7 namedClaimant
Mr N I Lone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham by CVP on 9 June 2021, Employment Judge Miller held that Mr N I Lone had substantially complied with the unless orders made by Employment Judge Broughton on 5 August 2020, as varied by Regional Employment Judge Monk on 4 September 2020. The effect of the judgment was that the claimant's claims did not stand dismissed because of any failure to comply with those orders.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the decision. The document does not record any substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural judgment only. The tribunal held that the claimant had substantially complied with the unless orders made on 5 August 2020, as varied on 4 September 2020, and that the claims did not stand dismissed in consequence of any failure to comply with those orders. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.