Case 1306389/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Bell v Rowley Care Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306389/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's complaint of 'TUPE Detriment'. It recorded that by letter dated 25 August 2020 the claimant had been invited to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment states that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the complaint of 'TUPE Detriment' was struck out. The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) were listed for a preliminary hearing on 15 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The complaint of 'TUPE Detriment' was struck out because the Tribunal considered it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 25 August 2020 to make representations or request a hearing, but did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.