Case 1306477/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306477/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing on 26 February 2020 at Centre City Tower, Birmingham, Employment Judge Perry sat alone. The claimant, Ms Corina Luca, appeared in person and the respondent, Midshires Care Limited, was represented by Mr A Mellis. The tribunal gave a unanimous judgment.
The tribunal held that there was no contravention of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that the claimant had not been subjected to harassment under s.26 or direct discrimination under s.13 of the Equality Act 2010, and those complaints were dismissed. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed as part of the tribunal's finding that there was no contravention of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed under s.26 Equality Act 2010 together with the direct discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Part 5 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.