Case 1306783/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Farquhar v Twenty-Four Seven Recruitment Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1306783/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Farquhar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Birmingham on 16 March 2021 before Employment Judge Edmonds. The claimant, Mr D Farquhar, did not attend and was not represented; the respondent attended through Ms J Hopkins, HR Advisor.
The written judgment states only that the tribunal considered the information in its possession and dismissed the claim. No further substantive findings, legal analysis, or remedy calculations are set out in the decision.
Because the reasons are limited to the claimant's non-attendance and the tribunal's decision on the material before it, the record does not disclose any separate monetary award or any apportionment of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not expressly label the claim type in the reasons; this classification is inferred from the case listing/case context. The tribunal simply recorded that the claimant failed to attend or be represented and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.