Case 1306807/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Liburd, Solicitor, NEU For the v No appearance or attendance. — 2020
- Case reference
- 1306807/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Liburd, Solicitor, NEU For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 July 2020 at Birmingham, Employment Judge Lloyd made a Rule 21 default judgment after recording that no response had been presented within the requisite time limit. The respondents had been put on notice on 30 January 2020 that judgment could be entered, and judgment was entered forthwith against both respondents in respect of the claims set out in the ET1s and particulars of claim.
Annex A formed part of the judgment and listed the individual awards for 14 claimants. The annex used the codes TUPE, WA, BOC, Pens and UDL, with the legend expanding them as failure to consult under regs 15 and 16 TUPE 2006, unauthorised deductions of wages, breach of contract for failure to pay notice, unpaid employer's pension contributions, and unfair dismissal/constructive unfair dismissal. The listed total awards ranged from £4,160.42 to £28,021.48.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Annex A expanded TUPE as failure to consult under regs 15 and 16 TUPE 2006. | Upheld | — | £70,654 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Annex A expanded WA as unauthorised deductions of wages. | Upheld | — | £16,169 |
| Breach of contract | Annex A expanded BOC as breach of contract for failure to pay notice. | Upheld | — | £12,441 |
| Other | Annex A used Pens for unpaid employer's pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £640 |
| Unfair dismissal | Annex A used UDL for unfair dismissal/constructive unfair dismissal and did not separate the two. | Upheld | — | £83,416 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £183,412
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.