Case 1307859/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Edreira v Severn Waste Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307859/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs S Bannister, Mr J Wagstaffe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Edreira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the Claimant's complaints against Severn Waste Services Limited over four days in February 2024 before Employment Judge Faulkner with lay members Mrs S Bannister and Mr J Wagstaffe. The judgment records that the Claimant alleged age discrimination and age-related harassment under the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that the Respondent did not contravene section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 by discriminating against the Claimant because of his age. It also found that the Respondent did not contravene section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 by harassing the Claimant related to his age.
As both complaints failed, the tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaints in full. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.