Case 1307966/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Ogunbayo v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1307966/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Ogunbayo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of indirect race/nationality discrimination and harassment arising from applications for work with the respondent and right to work checks. The tribunal found that the earlier COT3 agreement compromised claims up to and including 25 September 2023, but did not preclude claims against the respondent that post-dated that date.
On indirect discrimination, the tribunal considered the alleged PCP concerning documentation for right to work checks and reluctance to carry out manual checks. Taking the case at its highest, it found the claimant could not show that people sharing his race or nationality were put at a particular disadvantage, and that the October 2023 failure arose from an administrative error in the right to work check rather than facts capable of supporting an inference of race discrimination.
On harassment, the tribunal took the claimant's account of the 20 October 2023 incident at its highest but found there were no facts from which it could infer that the alleged shouting, instruction not to apply again, or blocking from the website was related to race or nationality. The discrimination and harassment claims were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success, and the redundancy payment claim was withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The indirect discrimination claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success, including because the claimant could not establish group disadvantage linked to race or nationality. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | The harassment claim concerning the alleged 20 October 2023 video call and blocking from the respondent's website was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found no reasonable prospect of establishing facts from which it could infer the conduct was related to race or nationality. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing on 12 July 2024 and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 39 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Ayanwu v South Bank Students Union and another [2001] ICR 391
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.