Case 1308175/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Monaghan v Unison West Midlands Community Branch and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308175/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs S Monaghan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an interim relief hearing heard on 12 January 2024 before Employment Judge Faulkner. The claimant, Mrs S Monaghan, appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr O Isaacs of counsel.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application for interim relief against the First Respondent. The extracted judgment record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning beyond that outcome.
The written record also states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment form.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Interim relief application against the First Respondent was refused at the hearing. The judgment does not state the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.