Case 1308664/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1308664/2023
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing on 3 December 2024 before Employment Judge Harding. The claimant, Miss Allen, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal considered whether the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time, identified in the judgment as July-August 2023.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not proved that she was disabled at that time. As a result, the claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and harassment related to disability all failed. Each of those claims was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed because the claimant did not prove that she was a disabled person at the relevant time (July-August 2023). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability; dismissed because the claimant did not prove that she was a disabled person at the relevant time (July-August 2023). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability; dismissed because the claimant did not prove that she was a disabled person at the relevant time (July-August 2023). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.