Case 1309000/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1309000/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs I Fox, Mr R Moss
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Perry sat with Mrs I Fox and Mr R Moss at Birmingham in a final merits hearing on 19 to 23 July 2021. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's Part 5 Equality Act 2010 complaints. It recorded that he was not discriminated against, and dismissed his complaints that he had been harassed and/or directly discriminated against because of race and/or disability. The written record does not set out separate findings for the harassment and direct discrimination complaints beyond that dismissal.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint, stating that it was not well founded. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The written record dismisses the claimant's harassment complaint and says it related to race and/or disability, but it does not separate the harassment finding further. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the direct discrimination complaint said to relate to race and/or disability; the written record does not distinguish any separate reasoning by characteristic. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the direct discrimination complaint said to relate to race and/or disability; the written record does not distinguish any separate reasoning by characteristic. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.