Case 1309189/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Plant (Nee Lardner) v Integral UK Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1309189/2022
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Plant (Nee Lardner)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 June 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The Tribunal’s reason was that the claimant accepted she TUPE-transferred to another company, Linaker, on 01 July 2022, so any claims she had against the respondent transferred to Linaker rather than remaining with Integral UK Ltd.
The Tribunal found that the respondent was not in law responsible for the issues the claimant evidently had with Linaker connected with and following the transfer. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out by Employment Judge Flood on 08 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action; it states only that the claim was struck out after the claimant accepted that she TUPE-transferred to another company on 01 July 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.