Case 1309530/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Lisa Nutt v Meggitt Aerospace Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309530/2020
- Decision date
- 3 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Steward Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lisa Nutt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLisa Nutt was employed by Meggitt Aerospace Ltd as a contract manager and was made redundant on 31 July 2020. She had been furloughed from 3 April 2020 and had received 80% of normal salary under the CJRS, with the respondent topping up pay to 100% for the first three weeks of furlough and later applying a clearly stated furlough pay offset because of the mismatch between payroll dates and CJRS claim periods.
The only live issue at hearing was whether there had been an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to July 2020 furlough pay. The tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that it had explained how the scheme and offset worked, and rejected the claimant's case that she had been promised the July furlough payment as an additional sum during redundancy consultation. It also accepted that the claimant had not called the person said to have made that promise and that there was no documentary support for it.
The tribunal found that the claimant had misunderstood how the furlough arrangement operated. It held that she had in fact received her July furlough pay on her final payslip, but that the offset mechanism and the fact she worked no actual hours in August meant there was a net shortfall only on the claimant's preferred analysis, not an unlawful deduction. Applying the burden of proof on the claimant and the respondent's reliance on section 14(1)(a) ERA 1996, the tribunal concluded that the claimant had been paid the correct amount on termination and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned alleged non-payment of July 2020 furlough pay after redundancy; tribunal found the respondent's furlough pay offset scheme meant the claimant had been paid correctly. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13(1) ERA 1996
- s.14(1)(a) ERA 1996
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.