Case 1309709/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Miu v Ideal Employment Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1309709/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Miu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case concerned Mrs F Miu’s complaint that Ideal Employment had failed to pay all outstanding holiday pay on termination of her employment. The final hearing was listed for 10 May 2021 at Birmingham by CVP before Employment Judge Cookson sitting alone. Neither party attended, and the claimant had also failed to comply with earlier tribunal orders, including an order to provide a schedule of loss.
The tribunal records that efforts were made to contact the claimant on the morning of the hearing, including a telephone message left on her mobile, but no response was received. In the absence of any explanation for her non-attendance, and taking account of the failure to comply with tribunal directions, the judge exercised the power under rule 47 of the 2013 Rules of Procedure and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint was about alleged failure to pay outstanding holiday pay on termination of employment. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend and had not complied with tribunal orders and directions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.