Miss B Gyan v UK Fuels Ltd and 2 others — 2026

The Tribunal struck out the claims against the second and third respondents, Radius Payment Solutions and Radius Ltd. The judgment records that, by a Case Management Order made by Employment Judge Maxwell on 25 July 2025, the Tribunal warned the claimant that it was considering striking out those claims because they appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success against those respondents.

The stated basis for the warning was that the claimant did not contend that she was an employee, contract worker or job applicant for either the second or third respondent. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but she did not reply.

Employment Judge V Jones was satisfied that the grounds for strike out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied, and that strike out was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judge recorded that the claimant had failed to advance the precise statutory basis on which she said the Tribunal had jurisdiction for the claims against those respondents to continue. No remedy award was recorded.