Case 1400078/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- MS P WHITE FOR THE v Sol Attendance Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400078/2022
- Decision date
- 30 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- MS P WHITE FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent did not attend the hearing. It held that the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and unpaid holiday pay were well founded and upheld.
The respondent was ordered to pay separate sums for each upheld claim. The unfair dismissal award comprised a basic award, a compensatory award, and a 25% ACAS uplift, with additional awards for notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and unpaid holiday pay, making a total award of £29,507.65.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Award comprised basic award of £4,009.50, compensatory award of £8,335.64, and a 25% ACAS uplift of £2,083.91. | Upheld | — | £14,429 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Judgment describes this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). | Upheld | — | £1,188 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £12,095 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment describes this as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,796 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,508
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,010
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,336
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.