Case 1400090/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Algar v The News Cafe Restaurant Plymouth Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1400090/2025
- Decision date
- 17 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Algar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing, which proceeded by video before Employment Judge Volkmer. The claimant was supported by his partner Ms Cartwright. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested.
The Tribunal upheld the claimant's claims of discrimination arising from disability and disability-related harassment and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £60,868.36 within 14 days. The compensatory award is £44,063.43, comprising £35,372.51 of lost earnings, a 10% ACAS Code uplift of £3,537.25, interest at 8% over 275 days from the midpoint date of £2,340.98, and £2,812.69 of grossing-up at a marginal rate of 20%.
The injury to feelings award is £16,804.93, made up of £15,000 plus £1,804.93 of interest at 8% over 549 days. No basic award is identified separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability and disability-related harassment both upheld. Award not split between the two claims in the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | £60,868 |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment upheld; award combined with discrimination arising from disability. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60,868
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £44,063
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.