Case 1400135/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nash v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400135/2019
- Decision date
- 13 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Members
- Venue
- Bristol Magistrates Court
- Panel members
- Ms Ramsaran, Ms Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Nash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol Magistrates Court on 10 to 12 February 2020 before Employment Judge O’Rourke with members Ms Ramsaran and Ms Maidment. The claimant was Mr S Nash and the respondent was Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited.
The written judgment states that the claimant’s claim of disability discrimination fails and is dismissed. It does not record separate allegations, factual findings, statutory provisions, or named legal tests in the written decision; the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
No remedy, award, interest, or other monetary figure is recorded in the written judgment, consistent with the dismissal of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only that the disability discrimination claim failed and was dismissed; reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.