Case 1400155/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Anwar v Petrie Tucker and Partners Limited t/a mydentist — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400155/2020
- Decision date
- 7 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Anwar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal held that the Claimant's claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay were well founded. The Respondent, Petrie Tucker and Partners Limited T/A Mydentist, was ordered to pay the Claimant £2,214.11 gross.
The tribunal also ordered the Claimant to pay the Respondent's costs in the sum of £200, and directed that those costs be offset against the payment due from the Respondent. On that basis, the net amount payable following the offset was £2,014.11. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states by consent that the Claimant's claims of unpaid wages and holiday pay are well founded, but it does not split the £2,214.11 award between the individual heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states by consent that the Claimant's claims of unpaid wages and holiday pay are well founded, but it does not split the £2,214.11 award between the individual heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,014
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.