Case 1400198/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Stevens v PRC Streamline Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400198/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Members
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr N A Knight, Mr N Thornback
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Stevens brought claims against PRC Streamline Group including disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. The tribunal sat at Southampton on 6, 7, 8 and 9 November 2023 before Employment Judge Craft with members Mr N A Knight and Mr N Thornback. It found that the claimant did not have a disability as defined in section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time.
Because the claimant was not found to be disabled for Equality Act purposes, the claims of discrimination arising from disability under section 15, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, and harassment under section 26 were all dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate remedy award for those claims.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability as defined in section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claims under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability as defined in section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability as defined in section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- sections 15, 20, 21 and 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.