Case 1400253/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ebrima Sanyang v Devon Partnership NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400253/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ebrima Sanyang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ebrima Sanyang brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Devon Partnership NHS Trust. The hearing took place at Exeter Employment Tribunal on 1 and 2 April 2025 before Employment Judge Volkmer, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only the tribunal's dispositive conclusion: the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. It also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the extracted record.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the extracted text does not set out any separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.