Case 1400290/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Taylor and 11 Others Mr A Smart and 28 Others v Complete Utilities Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400290/2022
- Decision date
- 9 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Taylor and 11 Others Mr A Smart and 28 Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese were claims for a protective award under section 188 TULRCA 1992 arising from mass redundancies at Complete Utilities Limited after the company went into administration on 11 November 2021. The claimants said collective consultation should have begun by 27 September 2021, that no employee representatives were elected, and that there had been no meaningful consultation before dismissal.
The tribunal accepted that CU had long-running cash-flow problems connected to its work for Gigaclear, but it found that the decisive event was the failure to receive the full expected payment at the end of October 2021. It accepted evidence that the directors genuinely believed the business could continue if that payment arrived in full, and held that there was no proposal to dismiss for redundancy until it became clear that the full payment would not be made. The tribunal also noted that a letter dated 5 November 2021 said consultation was being opened, but by then the financial position had already been fixed.
Applying the special circumstances exception and the duty in section 189(6) to take all such steps towards compliance as were reasonably practicable, the tribunal held that the late shortfall was unexpected in the context of the parties' previous trading and amounted to special circumstances. It found that those circumstances made full compliance with the consultation duties not reasonably practicable and that any further consultation would not have had a material effect on the dismissals. All protective award claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claims under s.188 TULRCA 1992 arising from the administration of Complete Utilities Limited and the dismissal of 20+ employees. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189(6) TULRCA 1992
- special circumstances exception
- Clarks of Hove Ltd v Bakers' Union
- Association of Patternmakers and Allied Craftsmen v Kirvin Ltd
- MSF v Refuge Assurance plc
- Junk v Kuhnel
- Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns
- UK Coal Mining Ltd v NUM (Northumberland Area)
- Akavan Erityisalojen Keskusliitto (AEK) and ors v Fujitsu Siemens Computers Oy
- United States of America v Nolan
- USDAW v Leancut Bacon Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.