Case 1400334/2023 · Employment Tribunal
First Claimant Mr Williamson, in person For the First v Kace Holdings Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400334/2023
- Decision date
- 8 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
First Claimant Mr Williamson, in person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a protective award claim brought by twelve claimants after they were informed on 1 February 2022 that their employment was terminated with immediate effect by reason of redundancy. The tribunal found that the first respondent had 41 employees who were all made redundant on that date, that the claimants were based at the respondent's head office in Winchester, and that the respondent was in creditors voluntary liquidation from 14 February 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent did not recognise an independent trade union for collective bargaining, did not appoint employee representatives, did not arrange elections for them, and did not undertake any, or any adequate, consultation before the dismissals. Applying section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with a number of the statutory requirements for collective redundancy consultation, so the claim was well founded.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award in respect of the twelve named claimants and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 1 February 2022. The judgment and annex explain the recoupment arrangements that apply to the protected award, but the extracted text does not set out the monetary amount payable to each claimant or a total figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under section 188 TULRCA for failure to consult over collective redundancies. The tribunal ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 1 February 2022, but the extracted text does not specify individual monetary amounts. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA
- s.188A(1) TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.