Case 1400480/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sypda Harris v Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400480/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sypda Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Harris brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited. The case was heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal via CVP on 3 and 4 October 2024 before Employment Judge Hay Representation, with Mr Harris appearing in person and Mr Wynne, Counsel, for the Respondent.
In the written judgment, the tribunal recorded that Mr Harris's claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were not well founded and were dismissed. The decision note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the published record unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.