Case 1400529/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr A. Ross — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400529/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton sitting at Havant on 10-13 August 2020 recorded that Ms L Kazingizi's direct race discrimination claims against University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust were not well founded. The extracted written record gives the outcome only and does not contain further findings of fact or legal reasoning beyond that disposal.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract, and the note at the end states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not to be provided unless requested. The public record extract therefore supports dismissal of the race discrimination claim but does not set out a remedy or a more detailed reasoning summary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states that the claims of direct race discrimination were not well founded. No further factual reasoning or remedy is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.