Case 1400531/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brodison v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400531/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Brodison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 1 March 2022 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out, on the basis that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 1 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The hearing listed for 4 to 5 April 2022 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unfair Dismissal; the judgment itself refers generally to "the claim" being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages; the judgment itself refers generally to "the claim" being struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.