Case 1400547/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Abdelsalam v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400547/2024
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Abdelsalam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of race discrimination and detriment on the grounds of trade union activities. The issues identified at an earlier case management hearing focused on the claimant's suspension by a warehouse shift manager after an alleged clocking offence, which the claimant said harmed his reputation and caused difficulties within his marriage.
The respondent applied to strike out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had breached case management orders. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not provided a schedule of loss or disclosure, no bundle had been agreed, witness statements had not been exchanged, and the claimant had not responded to correspondence or the tribunal's request for comments.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant appeared to have disengaged from the litigation process and that it was reasonable to treat that disengagement as a conscious decision. It found that the rule 38 threshold tests were met and that it was appropriate to strike out the claim; the July 2025 hearing was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records complaints under sections 13 and 26 of the Equality Act based on race. The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(c) and (d) for breach of case management orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies a complaint under section 26 of the Equality Act, apparently arising from the same factual event as the race discrimination complaint. It was struck out with the rest of the claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Trade union | The judgment records a complaint of detriment on the grounds of trade union activities under section 146 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act. It was struck out with the rest of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 38(1)(c) and (d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 3 overriding objective
- James v Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 684
- Bharaj v Santander UK plc [2023] EAT 152
- Emuemukoro v Croma Vigilant (Scotland) Ltd UKEAT/0014/20/JOJ
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.