Case 1400646/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Rawson v UK Health Security Agency — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400646/2022
- Decision date
- 12 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Rawson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal claim brought by Ms S Rawson against the UK Health Security Agency. Employment Judge Bax recorded that the claim was brought under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and was struck out on the basis that the Claimant did not have two years' service.
The judgment states that none of the exceptions within section 108 of the Act applied. On that basis, the tribunal did not determine the merits of the dismissal complaint and the claim did not proceed further. The judgment also records that the Claimant's other claims were unaffected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by consent because the Claimant did not have two years' service and none of the exceptions in s.108 ERA 1996 applied. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.