Case 1400727/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Knight v Havant and South Downs College — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400727/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Panel members
- Dr Thornback, Mr Spry-Shute
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs B Knight was a Black British English teacher who had worked on a variable-hours basis and wanted a fixed fractional post. The tribunal found that a permanent English teaching vacancy in May 2017 was not circulated internally, that she was the only likely applicant, and that the respondent gave no explanation for the omission. On the evidence, that supported an inference that the non-circulation was because of race, but the direct race discrimination claim was dismissed because it was brought long after the relevant events and the tribunal would not extend time.
The tribunal rejected most of the later discrimination, harassment and victimisation allegations. It did not accept that complaints shown to the claimant in June 2018 were fabricated, nor that the October 2018 appraisal delay or the later timetable changes were discriminatory. It found that the claimant's September 2017 complaint to Jon Myers was a protected act, but later conduct was not shown to have been because of that complaint. One December 2019 email comment by Ms Scott was found to be unwanted and related to race, but the tribunal did not find that it had the necessary statutory effect because the claimant did not know about it at the time.
The constructive dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal found that the 3 December 2019 drop-in observation was carried out for too short a period and that the immediate move to an individual improvement plan did not comply with the College's own guidelines. It also found that Ms Richardson gave misleading evidence in the 2020 grievance investigation about the number of complaints and the claimant's 2018 performance, and that the respondent then failed to keep in touch properly while the claimant was on long-term sickness absence. The claimant resigned in response to those matters, so the tribunal held that she had been constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. Remedy was left to a separate case management order.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found that a May 2017 permanent English teaching vacancy was not circulated internally and that, absent any explanation, the omission was because of race. The claim was nevertheless dismissed because it was presented very significantly out of time and the tribunal would not extend time on a just and equitable basis. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Most alleged acts were not made out. The tribunal found that one December 2019 email comment was unwanted and related to race, but it did not satisfy the statutory effect test on the facts because the claimant was unaware of it until disclosure. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal accepted that the claimant's September 2017 complaint of race discrimination was a protected act, but it did not find the later alleged detriments were because of that protected act. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence from the 3 December 2019 drop-in observation and individual improvement plan process, misleading evidence in the 2020 grievance investigation about complaints and 2018 performance, and failure to keep in touch during long-term sickness absence. It found the claimant resigned in response to those breaches and held the dismissal unfair. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
14 references- s.136 Equality Act 2010 burden of proof
- Nagarajan significant influence test
- Madarassy v Nomura
- Bahl v The Law Society
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Laing v Manchester City Council
- Shamoon detriment test
- s.123 Equality Act 2010 just and equitable extension
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- Malik implied term of trust and confidence
- Omilaju last straw
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals
- Lauren De Lacey v Wechslen
- Wisniewski adverse inference
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.