Case 1400778/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Isaacs (Counsel) For the v Renovo South Newton Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400778/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Isaacs (Counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Southampton before Employment Judge Gray on 10 March 2023, held that Ms P James's complaint for racial harassment succeeded. The respondent, Renovo South Newton Limited, had entered no response and did not attend the hearing.
The judgment records a discrimination award of £4,467.20. That sum was made up of £4,000 for injury to feelings and £467.20 interest, calculated by the claimant at 8% over 1.46 years.
No written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the period referred to in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal held that the Claimant's complaint for racial harassment succeeded. The judgment records an award of £4,000 for injury to feelings, plus interest on that amount. | Upheld | Race | £4,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,467
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.