Case 1400860/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Harris v TUI Airways Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400860/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Harris, brought a complaint of less favourable treatment against TUI Airways Limited under the Part-Time Worker (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000. After a preliminary hearing on 16 October 2019, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £500.
The order was sent to the claimant on 21 October 2019, but the deposit was not paid. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Because the claim was struck out for non-payment of the deposit, the hearing fixed for 24 and 25 February 2020 was vacated and no substantive determination of the complaint was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The tribunal struck out the complaint of less favourable treatment under the Part-Time Worker (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 because the claimant failed to pay the £500 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 16 October 2019. The order had been sent on 21 October 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.