Case 1400925/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400925/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Ms S. Maidment, Ms D. England
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's claims of constructive unfair dismissal, direct sex discrimination and disability harassment. The judgment records that the claimant, Miss G Crichton, succeeded on all three claims against Apple Retail UK Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £2,650, a compensatory award of £4,665 and injury to feelings of £10,500, making a grand total of £17,815. The judgment states that these sums were payable within 21 days.
No further reasons or detailed findings are set out in the extracted text beyond the stated claim outcomes and remedy amounts.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,815
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,650
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,665
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.